Orange-1 recount: Issue 2

The second issue in the Orange-1 recount matter is timeliness.

It is now more than three months after the general election on November 8, 2016 and there is still no final decision in the election for the second representative from Orange-1. This much of a delay is highly unusual and not acceptable except in the most extraordinary circumstances.

It is conceivable that if there are significant problems in the election process that need to be understood and fixed, a substantial delay could be understood. Elections are important.

The issue: Do significant problems exist in this matter that warrant this extraordinary delay?

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

Orange-1 recount: Issue 1

The first issue in the Orange-1 recount matter is time and expense.

The Legislature has invested considerable time in this matter: something like six to seven days in the House Committee on Government Operations; six to seven hours in the full House of Representatives; and time spent by the special sub-group of representatives to develop policies and procedures for the recount.

There will be further time incurred in the next few days by a group of 23 representatives who will perform the recount in public view in Room 11 at the State House. There was also time incurred by witnesses and government staff, especially lawyers in the Office of the Secretary of State.

Direct expenses are probably in the thousands, and if a cost for peoples’ time is considered, total expenses probably run into the tens of thousands.

Money is important, but I think the more significant consideration here is time. One of the most important decisions the Legislature makes is how to allocate its time. The people of Vermont might legitimately wonder if the Legislature has been wise in allowing this issue to take up so much of its time.

Certainly if there are significant problems in the election process that need to be fixed, a large investment in time and expense is warranted. Elections are important.

The issue: Do significant problems exist in this matter that warrant this investment of time and money?

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

Orange-1 recount: Facts

The Vermont House of Representatives is currently involved in a contested election for one of its members. The House district “Orange-1” consists of six towns in Orange county that collectively elect two representatives. Citizens vote for two candidates from a list, and the top two vote getters win.

There were four candidates in the general election on November 8, 2016. The top vote getter was Rodney Graham. That is not in dispute. The fourth vote getter was Adam DesLauriers. That is not in dispute. The dispute is between the second and third vote getters, Robert Frenier and Susan Hatch Davis. In the initial count on election day, Mr. Frenier won by eight votes. Ms. Davis requested a recount.

The recount was held on November 28. It was organized by the Orange county clerk who was assisted by town clerks from Thetford and Fairlee (neither town being in Orange-1) and others – all in accordance with law and normal procedure. The recount on that day had Mr. Frenier winning over Ms. Davis by six votes, with three questionable ballots (containing six votes total for all candidates) submitted to Superior Court for a determination.

Superior Court Judge Mary Miles Teachout held a hearing on December 19 and issued a judgment that day that ruled on the three questionable ballots (six votes) as follows: three additional votes granted to Mr. Graham, two to Mr. Frenier, and one to Ms. Davis. In other words, there were three disputed votes as to the count between Mr. Frenier and Ms. Davis, which Judge Teachout determined were two for Mr. Frenier and one for Ms. Davis. Judge Teachout declared Mr. Frenier the winner over Ms. Davis by seven votes.

On December 22 Ms. Davis submitted a petition to the House of Representatives challenging the election and requesting a second recount, specifically by the House of Representatives.

The House of Representatives convened on January 4, 2017. Secretary of State James Condos conducted the session until a speaker was elected. At the beginning of the session a point of order was raised. The House Journal reads:

Rep. Chesnut-Tangerman of Middletown Springs raised a Point of Order in that the member from Orange-1 is not qualified to be seated which the Secretary of State ruled not well taken as the court decision serves as the certificate of election and the member is qualified to be seated.

“The member” refers to Mr. Frenier who was seated.

Ms. Davis’s petition was assigned to the House Committee on Government Operations. The committee held several days of hearings and discussion. On January 25 the committee voted 7 to 4 to recommend a recount by the House of Representative. House Resolution 8 (H.R. 8) was subsequently drafted.

The full House of Representatives took up H.R. 8 on February 1. After more than five hours of debate and minor amendments the House approved H.R. 8 by a vote of 76 to 59. Procedures for the recount were then developed and subsequently approved by the full House on February 16 by voice vote. It is expected that the recount will begin on February 22 and conclude either that day or the following day.

In subsequent posts I will discuss issues that I see in this set of facts, as well as my opinion on this matter.

Articles in VTDigger on January 25, February 1 and February 16 provide more details.

(My opinion: VTDigger does a great job. VTDigger is a resource – nongovernmental – that Vermonters should feel good about.)

Update 3/02/17: Minor wording changes about the ballots submitted to the Superior Court for a determination to clarify the distinction between a vote and a ballot (which typically contained two votes in this election).

**************************

The question in the header of this blog is: What is a proper relationship between a free people and their government?

Does the matter of the Orange-1 recount relate to that question? Yes! An important part of that relationship is that the people elect the government. For people to trust their government, elections must be conducted properly.

Posted in General | Tagged | Leave a comment

An example of good government

img_0764_editedNow that I am retired from a career in business, I am spending time learning about government, especially state government in Vermont.

The website for the Vermont Legislature has been an invaluable resource in my learning process:

http://legislature.vermont.gov/

This website is well organized, comprehensive, and up-to-date. Information about legislators, committees, bills and resolutions, laws, budgets and schedules is easy to use. Every day that the Legislature is in session, the House and Senate Journals for the day, and the agenda for the next day, are posted in the evening. It is easy to keep track of what is going on. Well, except that there is so much going on that no one person can keep detailed track of everything. But everything is there and easy to find.

The people of the State of Vermont should feel proud that their government is operating openly and efficiently in this respect. My compliments to everyone involved in designing and building this website and keeping it up to date.

This is an example of good government.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

From the Berggruen Institute to Switchel

The weekend edition of the Wall Street Journal for February 11-12 has an interesting article:

Philanthropist Nicolas Berggruen’s Big Bet on Philosophy

It’s an interview with Nicolas Berggruen in the “Weekend Confidential” column by Alexandra Wolfe. It’s on page C11 in the print edition. The first paragraph:

Continue reading

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Seeking help for a presentation

I am seeking input for a presentation I am giving.

Next month I am giving a presentation to Leadership Lamoille on how to read financial statements of not-for-profit entities, for people who may be asked to serve on a nonprofit board. Leadership Lamoille is a leadership program sponsored by the Lamoille Region Chamber of Commerce.

The participants in the class primarily work in for-profit enterprises and should be familiar with the financial statements of for-profit enterprises. I also have experience reading financial statements of for-profit enterprises. In my 32 years at Yankee Farm Credit, I spent considerable time with both our own financial statements and the financial statements of many of our borrowers.  For this presentation I need to discuss what is different and important to understand about the financial statements of a not-for-profit entity, especially if you are considering serving on its board.

What information should I present? What would you want to know if you were in a class like this?

Posted in General | 1 Comment

Where do you get news?

The world of news is changing. No longer do the three TV networks of CBS, NBC and ABC dominate broadcast news. Print newspapers are shrinking or going out of business. News websites and blogs are ubiquitous, but reliable unbiased news seems scarce.

Where do you get news these days? Who do you trust?

At a brunch last December I was part of a discussion on this topic by five couples, all recently retired or soon to retire. Considering only online news sources – no TV – the following were mentioned:

Continue reading

Posted in General | Tagged | 3 Comments

The question in the header

Philosophy is asking questions and thinking about the answers, so let’s start with a question. I am interested in government and citizenship.

What is a proper relationship between a free people and their government?

This question is meant to serve as a muse for the blog. I placed this question in the blog header as a reminder.

I am interested primarily in state government at present. (I live in Vermont.) That seems like a manageable place to start. Certainly there are also interesting things going on currently with our national government, with the new administration of President Donald Trump. And there are always interesting things going on in the world. Since the late 1990s I have been the merit badge counselor for the local Boy Scout troop for the Citizenship in the World merit badge. So I won’t be writing exclusively about state government.

Stay tuned for more questions and thoughts about government and citizenship.

UPDATE: I was elected at Town Meeting on March 7, 2017 to the Select Board of the town of Cambridge. I am now much more interested in local government than I was before!

Posted in General | Leave a comment

A word from Mrs. TSP

In the previous post (“Welcome to The Switchel Philosopher“) George used two words that should give you pause: switchel and adventure. Switchel is an acquired taste, one that I never acquired. And our three children can attest from their growing up years that it was wise to be on your guard whenever George talked about an “adventure.” It meant one of three things:

  • He didn’t have a plan and was flying by the seat of his pants.
  • He had a plan but didn’t want to tell you because he knew you wouldn’t like it.
  • He was lost.

Consider yourself forewarned.

Once when George was still working I asked him what he wanted to do in retirement, and he replied that he wanted to be a philosopher. I told him in no uncertain terms that I did not marry a philosopher! Later I relented and said he could be a philosopher part-time. But really he has no qualifications to be a philosopher. So at best he’s a part-time amateur philosopher-in-training.

We’re still married after 37 years. It sure has been an adventure! It looks like retirement is going to be another adventure.

Posted in General | 1 Comment

Welcome to The Switchel Philosopher

Welcome to The Switchel Philosopher! I started this blog on February 8, 2017.

Switchel is a non-alcoholic beverage from Colonial times. It has been enjoyed by generations of farmers, especially on hot summer days in the hayfield. My mother made switchel for our family when I was growing up on the farm. It’s good stuff!

The essence of switchel is sugar, vinegar, ginger and water. In Vermont where I live, the sugar is usually maple syrup, but honey is also good. The vinegar is almost always apple cider vinegar.

There is a yin and yang aspect to many things in our world, as noted in the ancient philosophy of Taoism (or Daoism). Switchel is like that – with the sweetness of maple syrup and the sourness of vinegar. Hence the switchel philosopher.

My name is George Putnam. I grew up on a dairy farm in Cambridge, Vermont. After graduating from college with a degree in agricultural engineering, and a few twists and turns that included a masters degree in business administration, I became a loan officer at Farm Credit, a financial institution that lends money to farmers. Farm Credit was my career for 32 years, including ten years as president and CEO of Yankee Farm Credit headquartered in Williston, Vermont. I retired at the end of 2016.

In retirement I am spending time traveling in both the physical world and the world of ideas, looking for adventures to blog about. This blog is about adventures in the world of ideas.

For adventures in the physical world, see my other blog – The Switchel Traveler. My wife Nancy and I just returned from a 3+ week road trip to Florida, and there is a series of 20 posts there about interesting things we did and saw.

Posted in General | Leave a comment